{"id":792,"date":"2016-11-01T23:01:37","date_gmt":"2016-11-01T23:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/?p=792"},"modified":"2016-11-01T23:01:37","modified_gmt":"2016-11-01T23:01:37","slug":"1031-response-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/uncategorized\/1031-response-2\/","title":{"rendered":"10\/31 Response"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After reading both articles by the anonymous writer and by Kevin Gannon, I feel it&#8217;s really difficult to take a side or to disagree with both opinions because I think both authors have a point here. The digital world was invented for us (humans) to use it and to benefit from it, and I don&#8217;t think that the engineers who invented it made it exclusively available\u00a0for those involved with engineering. Speaking specifically about social media, I think anyone involved in any\u00a0academic field needs to use social media, just because it&#8217;s something immersed in our every day life, and it&#8217;s almost used everywhere around us, so it&#8217;s really hard to avoid it and push ourselves away from it. However, at the same time, I don&#8217;t believe that we\u00a0should\u00a0let it take over the traditional activities that we are accustomed to doing since we became involved in academia. Activities like, conducting research in a particular subject, responding to a presentation given by a speaker at a conference, getting a paper reviewed by\u00a0accredited reviewers, etc. Therefore,\u00a0the wy to go is to ballance between the two\u00a0sides of the spectrum.<\/p>\n<p>One of the points that Gannon mentions in his essay is that &#8220;social media has created opportunities for public engagement by scholars who don\u2019t fit the stereotype our <em>Guardian <\/em>essayist\u00a0privileges &#8230;\u00a0<span style=\"font-family: 'Merriweather','serif';\">me and others like me have found social media to be a democratizing and invigorating scholarly space.&#8221;\u00a0<\/span>(5). Now this point, is unfortunately a fact, and we can see that almost everyday online; however, I think that even if the opportunity is given to these scholars, it\u00a0doesn&#8217;t mean that what they&#8217;re saying online is always worthy of attention and consideration, it could be just nonsense. And from what Gannon is writing here, I get the sense that\u00a0because the &#8220;opportunities&#8221; are offered online (in the virtual world) for these\u00a0unconventional scholars, they stopped\u00a0looking for them\u00a0in the real world. So they settled for the online democratic &#8220;scholarly space&#8221; in exchange of fighting for places in the less democratic &#8220;scholarly space&#8221; in the real world. Although Gannon has readers reading his\u00a0published\u00a0articles in academic journals, he\u00a0seems\u00a0to be very proud of the number of readers for his\u00a0blog posts. Which could be a bit unfair comparison since there\u00a0is\u00a0a specific\u00a0audience reading the academic journal, which typically are scholars interested in the field of the journal,\u00a0versus an unspecified audience for the blog posts. Overall, I guess if Gannon had a solid proof to support his argument, like a survey or research findings, instead of expressing opinions and explaining personal experiences, his essay would have received more supportive comments from scholars who read it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After reading both articles by the anonymous writer and by Kevin Gannon, I feel it&#8217;s really difficult to take a side or to disagree with both opinions because I think both authors have a point here. The digital world was invented for us (humans) to use it and to benefit from it, and I don&#8217;t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=792"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":826,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792\/revisions\/826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}