{"id":837,"date":"2016-11-04T17:21:40","date_gmt":"2016-11-04T17:21:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/?p=837"},"modified":"2016-11-04T17:21:40","modified_gmt":"2016-11-04T17:21:40","slug":"mcgann-response-ls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/uncategorized\/mcgann-response-ls\/","title":{"rendered":"McGann Response [LS]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The discussion of subjects and objects by McGann is highly relevant to the tools we as digital humanists use. The way we interact with the humanities is a constantly changing and evolving sphere, especially when it involves the use of technology. We use DH as McGann says &#8220;to publish and to peer-review online &#8211; to carry out the major part of our productive educational work in digital forms&#8221; (McGann 55), broadening the audience in which we share our research, our analyses, and more.<\/p>\n<p>As humanists we are rooted in this process, and it&#8217;s becoming increasingly difficult to distance ourselves from scholarship that employs some form and\/or functions of technology. Because of this, McGann says &#8220;we do better to recall that as we are characters in these events, we bear a responsibility toward them&#8221; (McGann 50). Therefore, just as technology shapes how we interact how we work in the humanities, we influence what direction and shape it takes.<\/p>\n<p>Using a tool constantly is likely to lead to mastery, whereas learning is a persistent endeavor; it is not possible to master &#8216;learning&#8217; &#8211; there will always be more to discover, but tools have a limit to their complexity, even when they assist in that learning. That&#8217;s not to say, though, that the way we use these tools stays fixed &#8211; and DH&#8217;s tools are becoming complex in their own right. We can counteract this change, and develop a mastery of these new tools, &#8220;By designing and building the materials and applications tools that alone can teach how best to make and use these things&#8221; (McGann 52). The difference then, between humanists as people, and the humanities as a set of tools is that they can be mastered &#8211; people cannot.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The discussion of subjects and objects by McGann is highly relevant to the tools we as digital humanists use. The way we interact with the humanities is a constantly changing and evolving sphere, especially when it involves the use of technology. We use DH as McGann says &#8220;to publish and to peer-review online &#8211; to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=837"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":838,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837\/revisions\/838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}