{"id":863,"date":"2016-11-09T14:57:01","date_gmt":"2016-11-09T14:57:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/?p=863"},"modified":"2016-11-09T15:21:45","modified_gmt":"2016-11-09T15:21:45","slug":"golumbia-response-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/uncategorized\/golumbia-response-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Golumbia Response"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Digital Humanities seemingly uses the word &#8216;digital&#8217; in the sense that it implies that humanities is taken from a means of moving traditional scholarship to being housed within a digital interface. The use of the word digital appears to posit that DH is an entirely separate field of scholarship; when in reality there&#8217;s no solid definition as to what DH actually means or is comprised of specifically. I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as to say the word digital in DH is &#8216;inappropriate&#8217; but rather &#8216;misguided&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>The differences I see between DH and traditional scholarship is that traditional scholarship seems to already have its solid definitions and seems more insular and have a finite number of people that are able to work with certain components. DH allows for a much greater amount of participation from a variety of mediums. In the fields of DH, digital humanists are writing essays in Tweets for example &#8211; whether this makes it less &#8216;valid&#8217; in some opinions, is another story, the fact remains that they are making their arguments, using evidence, and involving scholars like traditional scholarship does. &#8220;DH says that teaching must change, both in terms of subject matter and teaching method&#8221; (Golumbia 161). The concept that we are even talking about and arguing over whether it counts as part of the realm of and\/or is connected to traditional scholarship appears to posit that the field is changing like Golumbia says. In fact, Golumbia takes this argument a step further: &#8220;It would make no sense to talk of digital linguistics in any thoroughgoing way because there is almost no linguistics that is not digital today; digital tools are required everywhere in the field, sometimes highlighted, sometimes not&#8221; (Golumbia 163). So I say that &#8216;digital&#8217; is &#8216;misguided&#8217; because of the idea that the field has a &#8220;<em>comme ci, comme \u00e7a<\/em>&#8221; attitude towards highlighting the usage of digital means &#8211; we are inevitably using digital tools throughout the humanities and digital scholarship &#8211; how those are manifested is where the subsets branch off, whether that is in the form of Tweets, blogging, or just researching online databases for helpful facts and argument points.<\/p>\n<p>As Golumbia shares, &#8220;I think, literary scholars would not ask what computational literary studies is had DH chosen for itself this far more descriptive but less ideologically effective name&#8221; (Golumbia 163).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Digital Humanities seemingly uses the word &#8216;digital&#8217; in the sense that it implies that humanities is taken from a means of moving traditional scholarship to being housed within a digital interface. The use of the word digital appears to posit that DH is an entirely separate field of scholarship; when in reality there&#8217;s no solid [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=863"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":924,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/863\/revisions\/924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sheilaliming.com\/428DH\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}